About Us
Conceptual framework for examining the Four Critical Aspects
Improve . . . student learning: ATE programs promise to increase student learning and also to expand its content. We know that ATE programs plan to increase student learning in liberal arts areas, including science and mathematics, at the same time they foster student learning in applied areas like engineering and technology. What we do not know is how a range of ATE programs measure student learning. What evidence demonstrates that students have gained more or different competencies than they would in conventional programs? This Aspect will apply research-based concepts and theories to discover an array of evidence used by ATE programs to verify student learning.
Design . . . novel curriculum and pedagogy: ATE programs often promise to develop novel curricular materials or ways of teaching to improve student learning. These products often blend content with pedagogy, so that students are self-directed to learn to construct their own meaning. Using indicators of high quality curriculum and pedagogy from research, this Aspect will explore the range of programmatic elements implemented by ATE programs to verify student learning.
Disseminate . . . innovative material: For NSF to gain maximum return on its investment in technician education in STEM fields, it is essential that innovations developed with grant funding be shared with educators at other sites. ATE programs rate themselves, and are rated by other colleges, by the amount of dissemination that has been accomplished. Applying research on the adoption of innovations, this Aspect will explore the variety of tangible and intangible products that our sample colleges have shared with others.
Develop . . . transformational leadership: Although ATE does not explicitly address a goal of developing leaders who can guide transformational change among the nation’s community colleges, we believe NSF funded activities might have this result. This Aspect intends to explore if engagement in ATE programs has facilitated professional advancement for faculty. If so, we will apply the American Council on Education (ACE) processes used by leaders to transform organizations in order to discover what types of NSF funded endeavors are likely to build leadership capacity.
|